PEOPLE v. SIDBERRY

Judgments affirmed.

The errors with regard to the prosecutor's summation were not properly preserved for review as no objection was raised at trial to the comments ( People v. Thompson, 97 A.D.2d 554). The trial court's Sandoval ruling was fair. The court considered defendant's history and precluded examination as to three previous convictions, but permitted examination as to others which were close in time to the instant offense. Mangano, J.P., Gibbons, Bracken and Niehoff, JJ., concur.