PEOPLE v. HARRIS

Judgment affirmed.

The record offers no support for defendant's arguments that his Wade and Sandoval motions were improperly denied. Nor does the record provide any support for his argument that his conviction was contrary to the weight of the evidence. Defendant's contention that Penal Law § 70.06 is facially unconstitutional has not been preserved for appellate review and is, in any event, meritless ( People v. Lemon, 62 N.Y.2d 745). The sentence imposed was not excessive. Titone, J.P., Lazer, Niehoff and Rubin, JJ., concur.