- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
BERNICK v. CIGNA CORPORATION
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department.
Jun 4, 1985
Order unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs, and motion granted. Memorandum: Defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1), (7) should have been granted. Plaintiff failed to show that the activities of defendant, the parent corporation of plaintiff's employer, sufficiently dominated the employer to make the parent a proper defendant (Musman v. Modern Deb, 50 A.D.2d 761).
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.