- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
LINDEN SHORE DISTRICT v. JOHNSON
Appellate Court of Connecticut
Jun 11, 1985
PER CURIAM.
We have reviewed the record and have closely examined the file and briefs in this case. We find nothing to substantiate the named defendant's claims of error.
During the course of the appeal, we denied the plaintiff's motion to strike the brief of the named defendant, without prejudice to the right of the plaintiff to renew its motion at the time of oral argument. The plaintiff renewed its motion. We again deny it.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.