PEOPLE v. PETERSON

Judgment affirmed.

Despite certain inconsistencies in the complainant's testimony and the fact that complainant had a criminal record, the resolution of his credibility was a matter for the trier of fact and his testimony does not "compel the conclusion that a reasonable doubt existed as a matter of law" ( People v. La Borde, 76 A.D.2d 869, 870).

Defendant's other contentions are without merit. Thompson, J.P., Brown, Weinstein and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.