PEOPLE v. CHARLES

Judgment affirmed.

Defendant's motion to suppress physical and identification evidence was properly denied ( see, People v. Allen, 112 A.D.2d 375). We note that the complaining witness who identified defendant had an independent basis for her in-court identification ( see, e.g., People v. Thompson, 97 A.D.2d 554).

Further, the evidence was sufficient to establish defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Any issues involving the credibility of witnesses were for the jury to determine ( see, e.g., People v. Bigelow, 106 A.D.2d 448).

We have considered defendant's other contentions and find them to be without merit. Brown, J.P., Weinstein, Niehoff and Lawrence, JJ., concur.