PEOPLE v. WINSTON

Judgments affirmed.

Defendant contends that the concurrent sentences of 1 1/2 to 3 years were excessive under the circumstances. However, the terms imposed were the minimum permitted by statute (Penal Law § 70.06 [e]; [4] [b]). In addition, since the sentence was in accordance with a negotiated plea agreed to by defendant, he could not, in any event, claim it to be excessive (see, People v Kazepis, 101 A.D.2d 816). Mangano, J.P., Bracken, O'Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.