PEOPLE v. LINDO

Judgment affirmed.

The record supports the finding of Criminal Term that the police officer was able to see the barrel of a gun in plain view as he looked through the window of defendant's car. The subsequent seizure of the gun was therefore proper, and defendant's motion to suppress the gun was correctly denied (see, People v Clements, 37 N.Y.2d 675, cert. denied sub. nom. Metzger v New York, 425 U.S. 911). Mangano, J.P., Brown, Rubin and Lawrence, JJ., concur.