DEMCHUK v. NORTH FORK BANK TRUST COMPANY

Order, as amended, affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Special Term properly determined that the confession of judgment executed by the plaintiff was supported by consideration and was thus valid, irrespective of the alleged manner in which the underlying guarantee was procured (see, Strong v. Sheffield, 144 N.Y. 392; Kail v. Department of Public Welfare, 62 Misc.2d 302). Bracken, J.P., Niehoff, Rubin and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.