Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

ROBINSON v. ARIYOSHI

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Aug 8, 1986
Judgment
Subsequent
References
CaseIQ
Case Information
CITATION CODES
citation codes
DOCKET NO.

No. 78-2264.

Attorney(S)

Alexander C. Marrack, Hoddick, Reinwald, O'Connor Marrack, for plaintiffs-appellees. J. Russell Cades, Robert B. Bunn, Cades Schutte Fleming Wright, Honolulu, Hawaii, Telford Taylor, Taylor, Ferencz Simon, Herbert Wechsler, New York City, William F. Quinn, Honolulu, Hawaii, Clinton Shiraishi, Shiraishi Yamada, Lihue, Hawaii, for McBryde Sugar Co. Ltd., et al. Williamson B.C. Chang, Sp. Deputy Atty. Gen., Honolulu, Hawaii, amicus curiae. Ronald Albu, Honolulu, Hawaii, for Waihe'e Farmers Residents Ass'n. Clinton R. Ashford, Mitsuo Uyehara, Honolulu, Hawaii, for Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Ass'n. Andrew S.O. Lee, Deputy Atty. Gen., Honolulu, Hawaii, for defendants-appellants. James H. Dannenberg, First Deputy Atty. Gen., Corinne K.A. Watanabe, Atty. Gen., Honolulu, Hawaii, for petitioners Ariyoshi, et al., on certiorari. Steven S. Michaels, Deputy Atty. Gen., Honolulu, Hawaii, for defendants-appellants, on certiorari and on remand.

JUDGES

Alfred Theodore Goodwin

Thomas Tang

ACTS

No Acts

See more information ... Less ...
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
ORDER

Pursuant to the order of the Supreme Court of the United States in George R. Ariyoshi, Governor of Hawaii, et al. v. Selwyn A. Robinson, et al., ___ U.S. ___, 106 S.Ct. 3269, 91 L.Ed.2d 560 (1986) the judgment of the district court is vacated and the cause is remanded for further consideration in light of Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson City, 473 U.S. ___, 105 S.Ct. 3108, 87 L.Ed.2d 126 (1986).

© 2026 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

x

Alert

Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.
Sign Up Login
x