Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

GOLDIN v. CONWAY MOTORS, INC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Aug 11, 1986
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

Order affirmed, with costs.

The complaint alleges that the plaintiff Shirley Goldin was injured when she tripped over a rope in the defendant's establishment. The deposition of the defendant's general manager, which the plaintiffs rely upon in their motion to amend, reveals that the rope was two feet long, about the thickness of a clothesline, discolored from use, was attached to the bottom of an overhead garage-type door, and was used to pull the door closed. In our view, these facts do not justify a claim for punitive damages. Contrary to the conclusory allegations in the amended complaint, as a matter of law, the alleged conduct was not so gross, wanton or willful, or of such high moral culpability, as to entitle the plaintiff to an award of punitive damages (see, Walker v Sheldon, 10 N.Y.2d 401; Bader's Residence for Adults v Telecom Equip. Corp., 90 A.D.2d 764). Hence the proposed amendment was totally devoid of merit (Krupp v Aetna Life Cas. Co., 104 A.D.2d 857), and the motion was properly denied. Lazer, J.P., Mangano, Brown and Weinstein, JJ., concur.