FISHER v. STATE

PER CURIAM.

Fisher appeals, contending the trial court imposed an illegal sentence because it is in violation of section 948.01(8), Florida Statutes (1983), under the rationale of Easton v. State, 472 So.2d 1369 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985). This court recently rejected the reasoning of Easton in Pittman v. State, 492 So.2d 741 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). Accordingly, we are compelled to AFFIRM.

SMITH, WENTWORTH and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.