SMITH v. STATE

PER CURIAM.

None of the reasons for departing from the presumptive guideline sentence given by the lower court in this case presents a valid basis for departure. See Scurry v. State, 489 So.2d 25 (Fla. 1986); Dixon v. State, 492 So.2d 410 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986) and Kirk v. State, 490 So.2d 176 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986). Thus, this case is remanded for resentencing within the presumptive guideline range.

REMANDED.

ORFINGER, COBB and COWART, JJ., concur.