HUGHS v. GOLD

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff's responses to the appellant's demand for a bill of particulars are sufficiently responsive under the circumstances of this case (see, Cirelli v. Victory Mem. Hosp., 45 A.D.2d 856; Patterson v. Jewish Hosp. Med. Center, 94 Misc.2d 680; affd 65 A.D.2d 553). Thompson, J.P., Niehoff, Weinstein and Spatt, JJ., concur.