SONITIS v. SONITIS

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated June 7, 1985, is dismissed, as that order was superseded by the order dated August 8, 1985, made upon reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated August 8, 1985 is affirmed insofar as reviewed; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondent is awarded one bill of costs.

Ordinarily, appeals from orders granting pendente lite relief are not favored inasmuch as it is clearly more expedient and less consuming of both judicial time and that of the attorneys if counsel promptly proceed to trial (see, Hildenbiddle v Hildenbiddle, 110 A.D.2d 819, 820; Epstein v. Epstein, 48 A.D.2d 792; Singh v. Singh, 41 A.D.2d 914). Thompson, J.P., Niehoff, Weinstein, Kunzeman and Spatt, JJ., concur.