AVERILL v. AVERILL

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The court's inherent power to vacate orders and judgments obtained by fraud or misrepresentation does not extend to intrinsic fraud such as that which the plaintiff claims to have occurred in this case (see, Matter of Lockett v Juviler, 65 N.Y.2d 182, 186; People v Harris, 118 A.D.2d 583, appeal granted 67 N.Y.2d 1053). Bracken, J.P., Brown, Niehoff and Kooper, JJ., concur.