PEOPLE v. DeANGELO

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

The evidence presented was sufficient to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant possessed the necessary intent to commit the offenses charged. The issue of his alleged intoxication was charged to the jury, and upon this record there is no basis for rejecting its verdicts (see, Penal Law § 15.25; People v Lynch, 23 N.Y.2d 262; People v Handly, 102 A.D.2d 922). Brown, J.P., Niehoff, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.