PEOPLE v. WILLIAMS

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

There was a sufficient degree of resemblance between the defendant and the other individuals who sat in the lineup with him to dispel any claim of undue suggestiveness (see, People v Accoo, 126 A.D.2d 730; People v Gairy, 116 A.D.2d 733, lv denied 67 N.Y.2d 942; People v Scott, 114 A.D.2d 915, lv denied 67 N.Y.2d 765). Thus, the hearing court properly determined that the complainant's lineup and in-court identifications of the defendant were admissible. Mollen, P.J., Bracken, Niehoff and Lawrence, JJ., concur.