HIGHSMITH v. STATE

PER CURIAM.

Appellant's convictions and sentences are affirmed. Hester v. State, 503 So.2d 1346 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987). We again certify the questions set out in Mitchell v. State, 507 So.2d 686 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Fryson v. State, 506 So.2d 1117 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987) and VanTassell v. State, 498 So.2d 649 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), as questions of great public importance.

SHIVERS, THOMPSON and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.