- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
PEOPLE v. SMITH
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Oct 26, 1987
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant knowingly and voluntarily waived his statutory right to seek review of the denial of that branch of his omnibus motion which was to suppress certain evidence as a condition of his plea bargain. Such a condition is acceptable and valid (see, People v. Williams, 36 N.Y.2d 829, cert denied 423 U.S. 873; People v. Moore, 123 A.D.2d 363, lv denied 68 N.Y.2d 1002; People v. Pescatore, 102 A.D.2d 834; People v. Greshen, 97 A.D.2d 799; People v. Rolston, 66 A.D.2d 617, 629, n 5, affd 50 N.Y.2d 1048). Under these circumstances, we will not discuss the merits of the defendant's suppression claim. Thompson, J.P., Niehoff, Eiber, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.