PEOPLE v. ABDURRAHMAN

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

That branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress a gun and shells seized from him was properly denied (see, People v Marin, 91 A.D.2d 616, 617).

The sentence imposed upon the defendant, which was the minimum prescribed by law was clearly not excessive.

We have reviewed the defendant's remaining contentions contained in his supplemental pro se brief and find them to be without merit (see, e.g., People v Almodovar, 62 N.Y.2d 126, 130-131). Mollen, P.J., Lawrence, Kunzeman and Harwood, JJ., concur.