PEOPLE v. POWELL

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contentions, the minimum permissible sentence imposed in connection with his negotiated plea bargain was neither excessive nor unduly harsh (see, People v Otero, 126 A.D.2d 678, 679; People v Orr, 111 A.D.2d 937, 938, lv denied 66 N.Y.2d 766; People v Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80). Mollen, P.J., Bracken, Rubin, Kooper and Spatt, JJ., concur.