- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
BRODER v. CITY OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Feb 4, 1988
We find that plaintiffs' failure to provide additional particulars to defendants respecting liability was not willful. Since plaintiffs did comply, albeit not in a timely fashion, with the prior order of the Supreme Court, in serving a bill of particulars dated May 16, 1986, we feel that the sanction of preclusion imposed by the IAS court was too severe, and modify accordingly.
Concur — Kupferman, J.P., Sullivan, Ross, Asch and Ellerin, JJ.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.