Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

PEOPLE v. PATERNOSTER

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department.
May 27, 1988

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The evidence was sufficient to show that when defendant unlawfully entered the buildings he intended to commit the crime of larceny therein.

The prosecutor's delay in providing defendant with the statements made by the witness did not constitute reversible error because no prejudice to the defense accrued thereby (see, People v Ranghelle, 69 N.Y.2d 56).