- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
GORE v. STATE
Summary of Opinion: James Grafton Gore v. State
Factual and Procedural Background
The record provided is limited. The matter is identified as James Grafton Gore v. State, Pet. Docket No. 31, before the Court of Appeals of Maryland, decided May 31, 1988. The only substantive content of the opinion is an entry indicating the petition (Pet. Docket No. 31) was denied. The opinion notes that Judge Cole would have granted the petition. No additional factual background or procedural history is included in the provided text.
Legal Issues Presented
The opinion addresses a procedural matter and does not frame distinct legal issues.
Arguments of the Parties
The opinion does not contain a detailed account of the parties' legal arguments.
Table of Precedents Cited
No precedents were cited in the provided opinion.
Court's Reasoning and Analysis
The provided text consists solely of the court's disposition: the petition was denied. No explanatory analysis, legal reasoning, or discussion of applicable law is included. The only additional notation is that Judge Cole would have granted the petition, indicating a differing view by one judge, but the opinion does not elaborate on the basis for that view or provide reasons for the court's denial.
Holding and Implications
DENIED.
Direct effect: The petition identified as Pet. Docket No. 31 was denied by the Court of Appeals of Maryland on May 31, 1988. A single judge (Judge Cole) recorded that he would have granted the petition. The opinion contains no reasoning and does not announce or establish any legal precedent beyond the disposition of this particular petition.
Pet. Docket No. 31 — denied. Judge Cole would have granted this petition.
Alert