- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
WILSON v. STATE
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Oct 4, 1988
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. Appellant has requested this court to correct the sentence document for Count III, delivery of a controlled substance, in that neither the concurrent nor the consecutive box was checked. We note that pursuant to section 921.16 Florida Statutes, where, as here, the court does not direct that the sentence be served consecutively, a defendant shall serve the sentences concurrently.
JOANOS, WIGGINTON and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.