Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

MATTER OF J.E. ROZE ASSOC. v. DEPT. OF LABOR

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department.
Sep 27, 1988
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

Determination unanimously confirmed and petition dismissed without costs. Memorandum: The determination of the Commissioner of Labor that petitioner Apco willfully failed to pay its employee prevailing wages is supported by substantial evidence. A violation of Labor Law ยง 220 is willful when the contractor acted knowingly, intentionally or deliberately (Matter of Green Is. Constr. Co. v Roberts, 139 A.D.2d 907; Matter of Cam-Ful Indus. [Roberts], 128 A.D.2d 1006) and where it knew or should have known of the violation (Gross Plumbing Heating Co. v Department of Labor, 133 A.D.2d 524; Matter of Cam-Ful Indus. [Roberts], supra). There was testimony that Apco's president and principal shareholder, James E. Roze, knew the difference between a journeyman and an apprentice, but that Apco paid an employee as an apprentice when in fact he did the work of a journeyman. With respect to the charge that Apco willfully ignored the requirement that an apprentice be enrolled in a registered training program, there is evidence that such requirement was known to Apco's former co-owner, Jack Valder, and its present superintendent, Mark Kjar. The acts and knowledge of those individuals may be imputed to Apco.