STATE v. COTO

Per Curiam:

The record does not indicate, and no determination was made, that Appellant's waiver of counsel was knowing and intelligent. Accordingly, the case is reversed and remanded for a new trial. State v. Bateman, ___ S.C. ___, 373 S.E.2d 470 (1988); see also Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 95 S.Ct. 2525, 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975); Von Moltke v. Gillies, 332 U.S. 708, 68 S.Ct. 316, 92 L.Ed. 309 (1948).

Reversed and remanded.