Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

DAVIS v. MEESE

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Jan 27, 1989
Judgment
Subsequent
References
CaseIQ
Case Information
CITATION CODES
citation codes
DOCKET NO.

No. 88-1687.

Attorney(S)

Stephen F. Gold (Argued), Philadelphia, Pa., for

Vaughan Finn (Argued), U.S.

of Justice,

, Washington, D.C., Virginia R. Powel,

U.S.

, U.S. Atty's. Office, Philadelphia, Pa., for

JUDGES

Aloyisus Leon Higginbotham

Robert E. Cowen

Ruggero John Aldisert

ACTS

No Acts

See more information ... Less ...
OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Van Artstalen, reported at 692 F. Supp. 505 (E.D.Pa. 1988).

© 2026 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

x

Alert

Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.
Sign Up Login
x