- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
BENKA v. OUTERBRIDGE
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Mar 22, 1989
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Appellant failed to object or acquiesced in the trial court to the various aspects raised on appeal regarding jury instructions and evidence. Thus, those aspects were not preserved for appeal. See Rindfleisch v. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc., 498 So.2d 488, 491-92 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Middelveen v. Sibson Realty, Inc., 417 So.2d 275, 276-77 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982).
LEHAN, A.C.J., and HALL and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.