PEOPLE v. SANTOS

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's assertions, we do not find the sentence imposed, which was the product of a plea agreement (see, People v. Kazepis, 101 A.D.2d 816), to be unduly harsh or excessive.

The defendant's challenge to the imposition of a mandatory surcharge upon his conviction is premature (see, People v. West, 124 Misc.2d 622; People v. Lewis, 134 A.D.2d 286; People v. Reid, 140 A.D.2d 639). Mollen, P.J., Bracken, Rubin and Sullivan, JJ., concur.