PEOPLE v. MOSS

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The trial court properly exercised its discretion in denying the defendant's motion for a severance (People v. Bornholdt, 33 N.Y.2d 75, 87, cert denied sub nom. Victory v. New York, 416 U.S. 905). There was not such a substantial difference in the quantity and quality of the evidence which the prosecution presented with respect to the defendant and the codefendants as to require a separate trial in the proper administration of justice (see, People v. Larkin, 135 A.D.2d 834; People v. Griffin, 135 A.D.2d 730; see also, People v. Kampshoff, 53 A.D.2d 325, 337-338, cert denied 433 U.S. 911; cf., People v. Pilon, 30 A.D.2d 365, 367-368).

We have considered the defendant's remaining contentions, including his claim that the sentence imposed was excessive, and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J.P., Bracken, Brown and Harwood, JJ., concur.