- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
GOODMAN v. GOODMAN
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
May 22, 1989
Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.
The order appealed from expressly recites that its terms were agreed upon by the parties, after conference. Since an order entered on consent is not appealable (see, Matter of Rosenhain, 139 A.D.2d 869; Bahr v Bahr, 105 A.D.2d 725; Baecher v Baecher, 95 A.D.2d 841; Matter of Pulver, 86 A.D.2d 705), and since the husband is not aggrieved within the meaning of CPLR 5511 by that to which he has consented (see, Smith v Hooker Chem. Plastics Corp., 69 N.Y.2d 1029; Pozzanghera v Anderson, 136 A.D.2d 912; Fuller v City of Yonkers, 100 A.D.2d 926), the appeal is dismissed. Mangano, J.P., Thompson, Eiber and Spatt, JJ., concur.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.