- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
ALEXANDRE v. PEPSI-COLA BOTTLING CO., INC
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
May 30, 1989
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Upon a motion for a change of venue pursuant to CPLR 510 (3) based upon the convenience of witnesses, the movant must establish the identity of the witnesses who allegedly will be inconvenienced, their willingness to testify and the nature of their anticipated testimony (Greene v Hillcrest Gen. Hosp., 130 A.D.2d 621; Brevetti v Roth, 114 A.D.2d 877). The defendant failed to satisfy that burden and accordingly its motion was properly denied. Mollen, P.J., Bracken, Rubin, Sullivan and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.