- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
STATE v. LEROUX
State of Connecticut v. Ronald LeRoux
Factual and Procedural Background
The opinion is a short procedural disposition in which the defendant, Ronald LeRoux, filed a petition for certification to appeal to the Supreme Court from an Appellate Court decision identified as 18 Conn. App. 223. The Supreme Court's document states that the defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court was denied.
Counsel listed in the opinion: Wesley W. Horton and Christopher Bromson appeared in support of the petition; Mitchell S. Brody, assistant state's attorney, appeared in opposition.
Legal Issues Presented
The opinion addresses a procedural matter and does not frame distinct legal issues.
Arguments of the Parties
The opinion does not contain a detailed account of the parties' legal arguments.
Table of Precedents Cited
| Precedent | Rule or Principle Cited For | Application by the Court |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Conn. App. 223 (Appellate Court) | This opinion does not state any rule or legal principle taken from that decision. | The petition for certification to appeal from that Appellate Court decision was denied by the Supreme Court. |
Court's Reasoning and Analysis
The opinion consists of a brief order denying the petition for certification and contains no explanatory analysis or stated reasons for the denial. The court did not articulate legal reasoning, apply statutory criteria on the record, or reference any standards in this short disposition.
Holding and Implications
Holding: Petition for certification for appeal denied.
Implications: The direct and explicit effect of the decision is that the defendant's petition for certification to appeal the Appellate Court's decision (18 Conn. App. 223) was denied by the Supreme Court of Connecticut. The opinion does not discuss broader legal consequences or create new precedent; no reasons or broader legal holdings are articulated in the document.
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 18 Conn. App. 223, is denied.
Wesley W. Horton and Christopher Bromson, in support of the petition.
Mitchell S. Brody, assistant state's attorney, in opposition.
Alert