- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
BARTHOLOMEW v. FOSTER
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Oct 3, 1989
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
The Court being evenly divided, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is affirmed.
STOUT, former J., did not participate in the decision of this case.
McDERMOTT, ZAPPALA and PAPADAKOS, JJ., dissent.
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
AND NOW, this 30th day of November, 1989, the Application for Reargument is denied.
ZAPPALA and PAPADAKOS, JJ., dissent and would grant reargument.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.