PEOPLE v. PIZARRO

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Even when read in the light most favorable to the defendant, there is no reasonable view of the evidence that would support a finding that the defendant's attack upon the complainant was justified. Therefore, the court did not err in declining to charge the jury on the law of justification (see, People v Padgett, 60 N.Y.2d 142, 144-145).

We have considered the defendant's remaining contention and find it to be without merit. Eiber, J.P., Harwood, Balletta and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.