SKELLY v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE CO

We affirm, since we find that plaintiff's employment was terminable at will. Furthermore, we find that Weiner v McGraw-Hill, Inc. ( 57 N.Y.2d 458) is not applicable herein, since plaintiff has not presented persuasive facts which indicate that defendants made any representations to him concerning employment security.

Concur — Kupferman, J.P., Ross, Asch, Smith and Rubin, JJ.