Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

PEOPLE v. SHIELDS

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department.
Nov 15, 1989
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant was charged in a felony complaint with robbery in the first degree and other crimes. While the felony complaint was pending in Rochester City Court, but before the case was presented to a Grand Jury, an order was entered in Monroe County Court compelling defendant to appear in a lineup. Defendant contends that County Court lacked jurisdiction because CPL 240.40 (2) does not authorize entry of such an order when a felony complaint is the pending accusatory instrument. The argument is without merit, and we reject decisions at nisi prius holding to the contrary (see, e.g., People v Steiner, 103 Misc.2d 844). It is well established that a suspect may be ordered to appear in a lineup, or provide other nontestimonial evidence, when "the People establish (1) probable cause to believe the suspect has committed the crime, (2) a `clear indication' that relevant material evidence will be found, and (3) the method used to secure it is safe and reliable." (Matter of Abe A., 56 N.Y.2d 288, 291; see, People v London, 124 A.D.2d 254, 256, lv denied 68 N.Y.2d 1001; see also, Matter of Pidgeon v Rubin, 80 A.D.2d 568.)