Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

PEOPLE v. HOLT

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Nov 21, 1989

Defendant's contentions as to the insufficiency of the allocution and of the opportunity to address the court have not been preserved as matters of law for appellate review. (People v Pellegrino, 60 N.Y.2d 636; People v Lombardo, 108 A.D.2d 873 [2d Dept].) We find no basis to exercise our interest of justice jurisdiction where defendant, represented by counsel and present in court, pleaded guilty to the probation violation charge. (People v Pons, 134 A.D.2d 378 [2d Dept].)

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Sullivan, Carro, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.