- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
PEOPLE v. MONTROSE
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Nov 28, 1989
The victim's eyewitness testimony was not improperly bolstered by the testimony of the police officer which, in any event, was brought out during cross-examination by defense counsel. Comments as to the victim's credibility and veracity in the prosecutor's summation did not unduly prejudice the defendant and were fair response to defense counsel's summation. Even though we have considered the merits and affirm on substantive grounds, we note that neither of these points was preserved for appellate review as a matter of law by appropriate objection at trial.
Concur — Kupferman, J.P., Milonas, Kassal and Ellerin, JJ.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.