Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

PEOPLE v. RAGLAND

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department.
Dec 20, 1989

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The court's denial of defendant's suppression motion is supported by the record and must be affirmed. The police stopped defendant's car for a suspected traffic violation and noticed a box of bullets in plain view. Under these circumstances the police had the right to order defendant out of the car and frisk him for weapons (see, Pennsylvania v Mimms, 434 U.S. 106).