- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
PEOPLE v. CANNON
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Apr 9, 1990
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The County Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defendant's motion for a severance of the counts of the indictment. The charges against the defendant were properly joined pursuant to CPL 200.20 (2) (c) (see, People v Kurtz, 51 N.Y.2d 380; People v. Famulari, 146 A.D.2d 710; People v Barksdale, 140 A.D.2d 531, 532; People v. Collins, 136 A.D.2d 720).
We have examined the defendant's remaining contentions and find that they are not preserved for appellate review (CPL 470.05; People v. Udzinski, 146 A.D.2d 245) or without merit. Bracken, J.P., Lawrence, Sullivan and Balletta, JJ., concur.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.