Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

DAYTON BAR ASSN. v. ELLISON

Supreme Court of Ohio.
Apr 11, 1990
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

Attorneys at law — Misconduct — Public reprimand — Neglecting an entrusted legal matter — Failing to initiate proceedings to modify certain provisions in a divorce decree.

Per Curiam.

We agree with the board's findings of misconduct and its recommendation. Respondent is therefore publicly reprimanded for having violated DR 6-101(A)(3) and 7-101(A)(3). Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

MOYER, C.J., SWEENEY, HOLMES, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, H. BROWN and RESNICK, JJ., concur.