PEOPLE v. MARSHALL

We find that the court accommodated defendant's First Amendment right to religious freedom by adjourning the hearing for one-half day. The focus of defendant's concern was a 2:00 P.M. service, and defendant does not claim that he missed the service.

We have considered defendant's remaining contentions, including those raised in his pro se supplemental brief, and find them meritless.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Milonas, Kassal, Wallach and Smith, JJ.