- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
PEOPLE v. SANDERS
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department.
Jul 13, 1990
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant's conviction of burglary in the second degree (see, Penal Law ยง 140.25) was supported by legally sufficient evidence (see, People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490). Defendant's claim that he had a license or privilege to be in complainant's apartment is without merit. There was no evidence that defendant had permission to be in complainant's apartment at the time the crime was committed. Further, we find that defendant's counsel, although inexperienced, provided meaningful representation (see, People v Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137, 146-147). Finally, the sentence imposed was neither harsh nor excessive (see, People v. Farrar, 52 N.Y.2d 302).
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.