- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. RESSING
Supreme Court of Ohio.
Sep 12, 1990
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.
Attorneys at law — Misconduct — Public reprimand — Engaging in conduct that adversely reflects on attorney's fitness to practice law — Engaging in sexual relations with client.
Per Curiam.
We agree with the board's findings of misconduct and its recommendation. Thus, we hereby publicly reprimand respondent for having violated DR 1-102(A)(6). Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
MOYER, C.J., SWEENEY, HOLMES, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, H. BROWN and RESNICK, JJ., concur.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.