Login
  • Bookmark
  • PDF
  • Share
  • CaseIQ

DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. RESSING

Supreme Court of Ohio.
Sep 12, 1990
Important Paras
Please sign up to view Important Paras.

Attorneys at law — Misconduct — Public reprimand — Engaging in conduct that adversely reflects on attorney's fitness to practice law — Engaging in sexual relations with client.

Per Curiam.

We agree with the board's findings of misconduct and its recommendation. Thus, we hereby publicly reprimand respondent for having violated DR 1-102(A)(6). Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

MOYER, C.J., SWEENEY, HOLMES, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, H. BROWN and RESNICK, JJ., concur.