- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
PEOPLE v. SWINDELL
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Oct 18, 1990
The Rosario material in question herein, while not timely disclosed, was merely duplicative of information already provided to the defense at a time when it was fully available for cross-examination of the witness. Consequently, reversal of defendant's conviction and remand for a new trial are not warranted under the circumstances applicable herein.
Concur — Ross, J.P., Milonas, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.