GIL v. INLAND WETLANDS AND WATERCOURSES AGENCY

The named defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 23 Conn. App. 379, is granted, limited to the following issue:

"In considering whether the action of an inland wetlands agency denying a building permit amounts to an unconstitutional taking of the applicant's property, what is the proper standard for determining a taking?"

Eugene F. McLaughlin, Jr., assistant town attorney, in support of the petition.

Patrick R. Gil, pro se, in opposition.