- Bookmark
- Share
- CaseIQ
PEOPLE v. MITCHELL
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Dec 10, 1990
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's assertion that the hearing court improperly denied his suppression motion is without merit, as the existence of probable cause to arrest the defendant was established by the testimony of the arresting officer (see, People v. Petralia, 62 N.Y.2d 47, cert. denied 469 U.S. 852; People v. Williams, 146 A.D.2d 724; People v. Molette, 129 A.D.2d 651; People v. Mingo, 121 A.D.2d 307; see also, People v. France, 115 A.D.2d 617).
The defendant's remaining contention is similarly without merit (see, People v. Russo, 45 A.D.2d 1040). Thompson, J.P., Brown, Balletta, Miller and O'Brien, JJ., concur.
x
Alert
Please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature.